| OTTAWA | Jan.
31, 2003 More than three decades after he was arrested, John Cooke
is one of 600,000 Canadians with a criminal record for
simple possession of marijuana.
The Renfrew lawyer applied for a pardon when he was 19, three years after he was
charged.
"I was visited by a couple of chaps from the RCMP," he
recalls. They asked several questions, but were most interested in
whether he was still using marijuana. He admitted he still smoked the
occasional joint, and the pardon was denied.
He worried that he wouldn't be called to the bar because of his criminal record.
But the law society told him that it posed no problem.
 |
| RCMP officers cut down marijuana growing near Maniwaki, Que. |
Other people are concerned that a criminal record could
prevent them from being bonded in the workplace. A criminal record
also can give customs officers the right to refuse entry to some
countries, particularly the United States.
Cooke, 49, has never had any problems crossing the Canada-U.S.
border but, he says, "I've had some anxious moments."
Is it criminal?
Some 600,000 Canadians have criminal records for simple possession,
according to a September report by the Senate special committee on
illegal drugs. The report calls for amnesty for these people, and
that marijuana be legalized and regulated like alcohol and tobacco.
| Thirty
grams, or roughly 1½ cups of loose pot, would roll between 30
and 50 joints
|
In December, a special parliamentary committee on the non-medical
use of drugs recommended decriminalization for possession of no more
than 30 grams of marijuana "for personal use."
Thirty grams, or roughly 1½
cups of loose pot, would roll between
30 and 50 joints, says Marc-Boris St-Maurice, founder of a
Montreal-based medical marijuana mail-order business.
In the courts
A rash of recent court rulings involving medical and recreational
users has threatened to topple the law prohibiting possession of small
amounts of marijuana. In December, the country's highest court was
scheduled to hear three cases, rolled into one constitutional
challenge. However, the Supreme Court of Canada hearing was postponed until
later this year, when the federal government is expected to make clear its
position on decriminalization.
Possession of marijuana is illegal under the Controlled Drugs and
Substances Act, except for some 875 Canadians who have special
authorization from Health Canada to possess and cultivate the drug for
medical use.
Justice Minister Martin Cauchon favours decriminalization. He says
he wants to introduce legislation this year. There is, however, a
question of what decriminalization means.
Contrary to popular belief, marijuana would remain an illegal
substance under decriminalization, says Eugene Oscapella, a lawyer
with the Canadian Foundation for Drug Policy. And there would still be
consequences for possession. "But you will not get a criminal
record for it. Nor would you go to jail. It could be like a traffic
offence and, if you accept the fine and pay it, you don't go to
court."
 |
| Marijuana
is the most commonly used illicit drug in Canada |
Growing just a few plants could also be decriminalized under the scheme.
A number of recommendations are being considered to change the law
for simple possession, says federal justice department spokesman
Patrick Charette.
Simple possession is a summary conviction charge and could technically
lead to a jail term. In practice, this rarely happens says Michel
Pelletier, national co-ordinator of the RCMP Drug Awareness Service.
Dealing with a criminal record
But anyone convicted will have a criminal record. Since 1997,
people caught with small amounts of marijuana haven't been arrested
or fingerprinted. There's no police mug shot or data entry on the
Canada-wide police information system. A court appearance is required,
but most first-time offenders avoid a trial by volunteering for community
service.
| 'It
could be like a traffic offence and if you accept the fine and
pay it, you dont go to court.'
|
That's why the Canadian Police Association, a 28,000-member
federation of police unions is opposed to decriminalization, says vice
president Mike Niebudek. He says the laws are already relaxed enough. "We do not understand why the minister is in such a hurry
to change the law."
Niebudek also says Canada needs a drug czar, like John Walters in
the U.S., to "quarterback the whole issue."
Support for existing law
On the other hand, the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police
supports decriminalization of possession and ticketing offenders, but
it wants police officers to be able to ticket at their discretion - in addition to the
tools they already have. This might include a summary-conviction offence, which could leave a criminal record. Pelletier,
speaking for the RCMP, says he supports the police chiefs' proposal.
Other organizations, such as the Canadian Centre on Substance
Abuse, recommend making simple possession a civil offence, with no
criminal charge option.
"Strict ticketing is the way to go," says Michel Perron, the
centre's chief executive officer. Perron, however, also is concerned
about how fines will stack up against other civil offences, such as drinking
beer in the park.
"Will we be telling people it's better to have cannabis than open
liquor?" Clear prevention messages for youth and access to drug
treatment should not be overlooked in the decriminalization debate, he
says.
Looking into the crystal ball
Perron says he also wants critical evaluation of any policy change.
"Fast forward five years. We'll be asked, 'Has there been more
drug use since we've put this in?' And we'll say, 'We don't know,
because we don't know what we started at.' "
Although some provinces have done youth surveys recently, the last
national poll asking adults about marijuana use was in 1994.
Last fall's Senate report estimated that two million Canadians used
marijuana during 2002. Clearly it's not just law enforcement agencies
and policy makers who are waiting for Justice Minister Cauchon to
introduce legislation to decriminalize marijuana. 
|