![]() |
| OTTAWA | March
22, 2002 — Canada's water could be
flowing to foreign countries soon, despite recent legislation that's supposed
to keep it here.
Jamie Dunn, water campaigner for the Council of Canadians, says that with the passage of bill C-6, an
act to amend the International Boundary Waters Treaty, Canada's water is in danger of being
exported in bulk.
The Canadian government defines a bulk water export as any
large-scale removal of water by manmade processes, such as canals,
tankers, trucks or pipelines. The water is not necessarily moved out
of the country, but it is exported from its original location at a
rate of more than 50,000 litres per day. Critics have no reason to worry because
the legislation doesn't allow bulk
water exports, says
Reynald Doiron, spokesperson for the Department of Foreign Affairs. Environment Canada and the Department of Foreign Affairs say licences can be granted for projects, such as dams, to control water flow.
Sections 13 and 16 of the act allow people with a licence to divert or obstruct water within a water basin. Dunn says these diversions could include bulk water export, because it's not spelled out explicitly that they won't. Some of the water basins in question stretch from the Great Lakes to the southern U.S. As such, Dunn says this legislation allows water to be taken from the Great Lakes and diverted to Miami. The council also complains that act doesn't mention coastal waters. The legislation only applies to water that lies on the Canada-U.S. border or flows between the two countries.
Support for the legislation
The commission
is not concerned, because the legislation doesn't allow bulk water
exports, spokesperson Fabien Lengellé says. "That's
not an opinion held by all NAFTA partners," Dunn says. "It
is not in the agreement anywhere that water is protected."
|
|
|